Join the Massachusetts Apprentice Network for the one-year anniversary of its launch.
03/27/2023
9:30am - 11:00am
Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce
This event will explore why in-game advertising is becoming the next big advertising channel and how companies can tap into the gaming ad space.
03/28/2023
5:30pm - 7:30pm
Mediahub
Thank you for joining us for our second Government Affairs forum of the year that featured Ronald J. Mariano, Massachusetts Speaker of the House.
03/30/2023
9:45am - 11:00am
Colonnade Hotel
Designed for mid-level managers and supervisors, this new certificate program addresses workplace well-being through unique, innovative, and actionable methods.
Join our Transformational DEI Certificate! Our comprehensive learning & development offerings are designed to connect and grow strong leaders who lead both inside and out of the office.
Our Women’s Leadership Program enables you to take your leadership to the next level by arming you with the most in-demand leadership toolkit.
Expand your DEI professional development with a virtual workshop focused specifically on LGBTQIA+ identities and inclusion.
Our Economic Inclusion Committee provides strategic support around research, policies, and programs that are focused on building equal opportunity.
We are developing an ecosystem of corporations and partners with the influence and buying power to transform economic inclusion for minority business enterprises (MBEs).
The Fierce Urgency of Now Festival brings Boston’s diverse young professionals together with business leaders, organizations and their peers to build connection, advance careers and ignite positive change.
09/12/2023 -
09/15/2023
Greater Boston
City Awake empowers young professionals in a variety of ways that encourages these rising leaders to stay invested in the region’s future success.
BIMA (the Boston Interactive Media Association) serves a vibrant community of like-minded professionals from agencies, brands, publishers, and ad-tech companies with business interests in the New England market.
For more than 25 years, the Chamber’s Women’s Network has connected female professionals of all background and career levels. Today, our Women’s Network is the largest in New England, strengthening the professional networks of women each year.
Through MITX (the Massachusetts Innovation and Technology Exchange), we’re building valuable connections between the people and ideas behind technology and its impact on the future of customer experiences, all to create a community that’s finding tomorrow’s solutions together.
We support small business through public policy initiatives, events designed to connect small businesses in Greater Boston to their peers and established business leaders, professional development offerings, and free small business advising.
Explore our mission and values to better understand how we are leading the business community forward.
Our member directory is your resource to discover, connect, and engage with Boston’s businesses from every industry and sector.
March 8, 2023
The Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce opposes the administration’s proposed change to Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP). The Chamber is deeply concerned that the City is advancing a policy that has no clear goals, makes housing development infeasible, and comes at a time when the City is also pursuing other policies that will negatively impact housing production in Boston.
No Goals
The City’s proposal omits the specific outcomes and goals it seeks to achieve with this policy change. The City’s Housing Conditions and Real Estate report, which accompanied the IDP change, states that the administration will establish new housing goals as they update City housing policies and programs. The only other time a goal is referenced in the report is to describe a goal of increasing homeownership rates among BIPOC households.[1]
The outcomes that the City wants to achieve through such a major policy change should be specific and measurable. Clear-cut goals will allow the City and other stakeholders to track the success of the program, determine whether changes need to be made, or if a new policy is more appropriate to pursue. For example, this proposal could project the number of new IDP units created, the impact on housing production, or how success or failure is going to be measured.
Feasibility Concerns
The City’s feasibility analysis fails to cover many critical aspects of the proposal, shows that even modest changes to the IDP can lower or eliminate project feasibility, and bases the analyses on a series of assumptions. As a result, the study inadequately analyzes the effects on project feasibility and housing development in Boston.
The feasibility analysis presented with the proposed IDP changes does not actually analyze the administration’s proposed policy changes. In particular, the administration seeks to change the IDP from a percent of units set aside as affordable to a percent of square footage set aside as affordable. However, the feasibility study examines the impact of increasing the required percent of units set aside as affordable from 13% to 20%, without analyzing the impact from a switch to the square footage measure.
Depending on how much square footage IDP units account for in a development, the move to a square footage metric could be a significant change that impacts housing production. The city’s own remarks suggest that the majority of IDP units are now smaller-sized – studios and one bedrooms – so shifting to a square footage measure may ultimately increase the total share of a project that is dedicated to IDP compliance than it would under a unit measure.[2] This would have a significant effect on a project’s financial feasibility. However, without the analysis for the square footage measure, we do not know exactly what impact this policy change will have on future development.
Regardless of the distinction between units and square footage, the feasibility study clearly demonstrates that even modest changes to the city’s existing IDP policy will make it harder and, in some cases, infeasible to build because of financial metrics. For large projects in the inner core, the study concludes that at a 20% IDP unit set aside standard, projects may have to seek cost relief in order to be financially viable.[3] For small projects in the City’s outer core, a developer must seek cost relief to remain financially viable at a 20% IDP unit set aside standard.[4] These findings signal to housing developers that investing in housing may not be a viable option going forward. For some, this could mean the difference between building and staying out of the market.
The analysis also applies material assumptions across all projects, each of which must be met to reach feasibility. Most notably, project feasibility depends on a 10% rent premium on new units.[5] That assumption cuts against what the city needs: the already high cost of market-rate housing in Boston will be driven up further just to make future projects viable.
With these assumptions in place, many projects, such as mid-sized developments of 125 units in both the inner and outer core of the City, hover on the edge of feasible versus infeasible. Furthermore, according to the study, many projects still “may not be financially viable to all investors.”[6] Driving away housing developments from the market undercuts what appears to be the intent of the policy: to add more affordable housing units. If the City’s goal is to increase the number of income-restricted units, making housing developments less feasible is the wrong approach.
Ultimately, the city – and the region – need to increase housing supply. If changes to the IDP make building housing in Boston infeasible to developers, then this proposal will have the opposite impact by decreasing future housing production.
Additional Housing Proposals
The City is actively proposing or has implemented policies at odds with the IDP changes or raise the cost to develop and maintain real estate in Boston. It is unclear whether the City’s feasibility analysis considers any of these additional policy actions.
For example, the City is pursuing rent stabilization but its own feasibility study for IDP shows that 10% premiums on market-rate rent is necessary to make housing development feasible. As a result, the IDP changes would require that new housing development financing be structured in a way that is diametrically opposed to rent stabilization and creating affordable market rate housing.
The Chamber fully agrees that housing affordability is a major challenge to attracting and retaining members of our community. We have consistently advocated for ways to increase housing production and supply such as the Housing Choice Act to meet the housing needs of the region. The proposed changes to the City’s IDP will make it more difficult for the region to meet its housing needs at a time when talent has more mobility than ever.
[1] Boston Housing Conditions & Real Estate Trends Report 2022, Page 39.
[2] Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy: Background and Zoning Proposal, City of Boston, Page 15, “Under the new policy, rather than require a set number of inclusionary units, requirements will be calculated in square footage, to allow for more flexibility and the production of family-sized units.”
[3] Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP) Analysis, RKG Associates, Inc. Page 62.
[4] Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP) Analysis, RKG Associates, Inc. Page 58.
[5] Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP) Analysis, RKG Associates, Inc. Page 52.
[6] Boston’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP) Analysis, RKG Associates, Inc. Pages 59-60.
Popular Resources